Since Donald Trump became president, his administration has tried to lend a helping hand to fossil-fuel businesses —coal in particular. After Tuesday’s midterm elections, Trump is still president, and energy policy will largely remain the same at the federal level.
But what about in the states? There, a whole lot may be about to change.
Nationwide, at least 10 candidates for governor won their races who campaigned on aggressively moving their states away from burning fossil fuels and toward relying on renewable forms of energy for electricity.
The newly minted governors, all of them Democrats, will serve from California to Maine and aim to inch the United States closer to meeting its emissions-reduction commitments under the Paris climate agreement at a time when the federal government under Trump is largely ignoring scientists who say the world has little time to get climate change under control.
The victor in Nevada, Steve Sisolak (D), endorsed a successful ballot measure there to get half the state’s power from wind, solar and other renewable sources by 2030. California governor-elect Gavin Newsom (D) said he was proud to see his predecessor, Gov. Jerry Brown (D), sign into law a plan to produce all of the state’s power from carbon-free sources by 2045.
Minnesota governor-elect Tim Walz (D) and New Mexico governor-elect Michelle Lujan Grisham (D) each vowed to get half their states’ power from renewable sources within a dozen years.
“Gone are the days where anyone talks about New Mexico not being in first place,” Lujan Grisham said at the start of her victory speech in Albuquerque Tuesday evening. “We will lead from today and on in renewable clean energy and we will be known as the clean energy state of America.”
Six other winning gubernatorial candidates, all Democrats — Jared Polis of Colorado, J.B. Pritzker of Illinois, Janet Mills of Maine, Gretchen Whitmer of Michigan, Kate Brown of Oregon and Tony Evers of Wisconsin — each told state affiliates of the League of Conservation Voters they will try to get all of their respective states’ electricity from “clean” energy sources by the middle of the century.
Environmentalists hope state leaders can pick up where Barack Obama left off. The Trump administration is seeking to repeal an Obama-era plan to require states to meet strict carbon dioxide emissions standards.
Even if that federal rule is fully scrapped, the 2018 election means many states will be led by governors who will try to compel utilities to buy significant portions of their power from solar and wind projects.
“Those are the kind of solutions that are incredibly popular with the public,” said Gene Karpinski, president of the LCV, which spent more than $80 million during the 2018 election cycle to elect a slate for mostly Democratic candidates. “Governors have already embraced them in many places.”
Democratic gains in statehouses across the country have buoyed the chances of state-level renewable energy legislation. The change in control of governor mansions may prove pivotal in Maine, Nevada and New Mexico, where in recent years Republican governors vetoed renewable energy bills.
In those states, there is hope among progressives of a repeat of what happened in New Jersey in the past year. After years of foot-dragging on renewable energy under former governor Chris Christie (R), Democrat Phil Murphy was elected governor in 2017 and shortly thereafter signed into law a commitment to get half the state’s power from renewable sources by 2030. In New Jersey, much of that will come from offshore wind.
In total, Democrats will control the governorships and both legislative chambers in 14 states — up from just eight before Election Day. Democrats also secured supermajorities in both the upper and lower chambers of Oregon’s legislature, paving the way for progressive energy legislation there.
However, when tested directly on the ballot — rather than just as part of a gubernatorial candidate’s broader platform — renewable energy standards saw more mixed results.
Voters in Arizona defeated a measure that would have sped up the sunny state’s shift toward solar and wind energy amid a gush of more than $54 million in political spending from proponents and opponents of the ballot question.
In neighboring Nevada, however, voters approved a measure similar to the one Arizonans rejected. But Nevada’s largest electric utility sat out that ballot fight, unlike Arizona’s. Before Nevada’s measure could become law, it has to survive a second vote in 2020.
|You are reading The Energy 202, our must-read tipsheet on energy and the environment.|
|Not a regular subscriber?|
— “I’m very happy with most of my Cabinet”: That’s what Trump said yesterday when asked about the job security of his Interior secretary.
During a winding and tense post-midterm news conference, Trump told reporters he was “looking at” Ryan Zinke, who is being investigated amid allegations he violated ethics rules.
“We’re looking at a lot of different things, including Cabinet,” Trump said. He added of Zinke: “We’re looking at that, and I do want to study whatever is being said… I think he’s doing an excellent job, but we will take a look at that, and we’ll probably have an idea on that in about a week.” The remarks also came hours before Attorney General Jeff Sessions resigned at the request of the president, the first in what some expect could be a wider post-election Cabinet shake-up.
Is Zinke next? In private, Trump has called Zinke “one of his favorite Cabinet members,” Politico reports. In weighing whether to fire Zinke or other Cabinet members, “Trump will be torn between his desire to dump people he dislikes or considers unhelpful and the optics of mass firings and potentially ugly Senate confirmation fights, according to several White House aides and Trump allies.”
More from that news conference: Trump looked to strike a tone of bipartisanship at times during the press event, and seemed to signal he’d be open to working with Democrats on environmental policy, though he cited no specifics.
“I expect that they will come up with some fantastic ideas that I can support on the environment, on so many different things,” he said. Trump said “we must all work together” to “advance really great policy, including environmental policy. We want crystal-clean water. We want beautiful, perfect air. Air and water, it has to be perfect… So environmental is very important to me.”
— The year of STEM: More of the candidates who ran in this year’s midterm election had degrees in science, medicine and engineering than in any other election, and seven of them won seats in the House, The Post’s Ben Guarino and Sarah Kaplan report. By training or profession, the Democratic newcomers to Congress will include:
- a biochemist,
- an industrial engineer,
- an ocean engineer,
- a nuclear engineer,
- a registered nurse,
- and dentist.
To boot, pediatrician Kim Schrier was ahead in her race for Washington’s 8th istrict as of Wednesday morning.
Why does it matter? “The pending Democratic takeover of the House is likely to shake up how Congress handles science,” Guarino and Kaplan write. Under its current chairman, Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Tex.), the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology has “questioned National Science Foundation grants, fought to curb federal research on climate change and used subpoena power to demand scientists’ data and correspondence.”
In contrast, Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson (D-Tex.), the first registered nurse elected to Congress who is poised to lead the panel, has strong positive rating from the LCV.
— EPA loosens some air-permitting requirements: The Trump administration published a policy change that would make it easier for facilities that produce air pollutants to bypass a permitting process. “The policy is part of a series of actions the EPA has taken to overhaul the New Source Review process and narrow the projects that need go through permitting as if they were new construction,” The Hill reports.
— U.S. government warns of Iranian tanker liability: The State Department is warning foreign nations not to allow Iranian oil tankers to enter their territorial waters or ports, the Associated Press reports. Such a move could “run afoul of U.S. sanctions and not only incur penalties but could result in catastrophic economic and environmental damage should an accident occur. That’s because insuring Iranian tankers is also a violation of the U.S. sanctions that came into force this week,” per the report.
— Poland inks U.S. gas deal: Poland’s state gas company PGNiG has signed a 24-year contract with American supplier Cheniere to receive liquefied natural gas, or LNG, from the United States, the Associated Press reports. “This is a sign across Europe that this is how your energy security will be developed, your energy sources diversified,” Energy Secretary Rick Perry said during a ceremony in Warsaw. Increasing LNG exports to Europe, in order to ween allies off of depending on Russia for fuel, has been a priority for both the Trump and Obama administrations.
- The United States Energy Association holds an event on the Energy Department’s Office of Fossil Energy Solid Oxide Fuel Program.
— What the midterms meant for environmental issues: Watch me (on just three hours of sleep) explain how ballot energy-related initiatives in Arizona, Colorado and Washington fell short.